Last updated April 2026. Prices move weekly — keep checking back.

If you’ve been watching the AI GPU market, you already know the usual tension: NVIDIA dominates mindshare and most of the benchmarks, AMD is cheaper per gigabyte of VRAM but software support lags, and Intel keeps quietly shipping cards that punch well above their price tag but nobody talks about them. Meanwhile the actual hardware question most customers ask us is just: “How much VRAM do I need, and what’s the cheapest card that gets me there?”
This post is our answer as of mid-April 2026. We’ve broken the market into seven VRAM tiers, from the $349 low-profile starter card to a $16,500 datacenter accelerator, and matched each tier to the model sizes it actually runs well. All prices are current street prices, not MSRPs. At the end we’ll tie each tier back to one of our AI servers.
As a rule of thumb for local inference:
So the VRAM tier you need is driven by what you want to run, not by marketing tier names. Here’s how the 2026 market actually lines up.
| Tier | VRAM | Price range | Models it runs comfortably | Example cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-Profile (2U) | 8–16 GB | $320–$450 | 3B–8B quantized, embeddings, small classifiers | RTX 5060 LP, Intel Arc Pro B50, nVidia RTX A1000/A2000 LP |
| Entry | 16 GB | $480–$1,500 | 7B–13B full, 30B quantized | RTX 4060 Ti, RTX 5070 Ti, RTX 5080, AMD RX 9060 XT 16GB, AMD RX 9070 |
| Workstation | 20 GB single-slot | $1,280–$2,500 | 13B full, 34B quantized; quiet, ECC, space-efficient | nVidia RTX A4000 Ada (single-slot), AMD Radeon Pro W7800 32GB |
| Prosumer | 24–32 GB | $2,000–$3,740 | 34B full, 70B quantized | RTX 3090 Ti refurb, AMD RX 7900 XTX, RTX 5090 (availability-dependent) |
| Server | 48 GB | $1,299–$8,800 | 70B full, early 100B class | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual 48GB, RTX 6000 Ada, NVIDIA L40S (passive), AMD Radeon Pro W7900 |
| Flagship | 96 GB | ~$9,680 | 70B full comfortably, 120B quantized, long-context everything | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB ECC |
| Datacenter | 192 GB HBM3 | $15k+ (by quote) | Serious training + 405B-class inference | AMD Instinct MI300X |
If you only remember two things from this post, remember these:
Intel Arc Pro B50 ($399). A 16 GB low-profile card for under $400 didn’t exist twelve months ago. This card ships with both a standard and a low-profile bracket in a dual-slot form factor, slides into a 2U chassis without drama, and gets you enough VRAM for 7B-class models, embedding pipelines, and small classification workloads. As a starter card for a team dipping into local AI, nothing NVIDIA sells competes on $/GB at this form factor.
Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual 48GB ($1,299). This one is genuinely wild. Intel’s Project Battlematrix puts two Arc Pro B60 GPUs on a single PCIe card with 48 GB total VRAM — at roughly a fifth the price of an NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada ($7,150) or a quarter the price of an L40S ($8,800). The software stack isn’t as mature as CUDA and your specific workload may or may not run well on Intel’s Battlematrix Linux drivers, but if your model runs, you’re getting 48 GB of VRAM for $1,299. For inference-bound 70B-quantized workloads where you don’t need peak training throughput, this is the best $/VRAM-GB in the market right now by a wide margin.
AMD’s RDNA 4 generation (RX 9060 XT, RX 9070, RX 9070 XT) turns out to be genuinely competitive for consumer-grade AI inference once you’re running on a framework that’s ROCm-aware — llama.cpp, Ollama, and vLLM all work. Performance-per-dollar on 16GB RDNA 4 cards is very close to the NVIDIA 50-series and sometimes ahead. For customers who don’t need CUDA and want to avoid NVIDIA’s pricing, this is a real path.
On the workstation side, AMD’s Radeon Pro W7800 (32 GB) and W7900 (48 GB) are direct replacements for NVIDIA’s RTX A5000/A6000 at roughly half the price, with ECC memory and workstation driver support. If you’re building a quiet single-user AI workstation, the W-series deserves a serious look.
At the top end, the AMD Instinct MI300X with 192 GB of HBM3 is the only single card that holds an entire 405B-class model in VRAM without any quantization tricks. It’s quote-only, it’s expensive, and the software story is still improving — but for the handful of customers for whom “does it fit” is more important than any other consideration, it’s currently the only game in town below $30k.
We built our AI rackmount server line around this same VRAM-first thinking. Each model defaults to a different VRAM tier out of the box, and you can upgrade within the tier or jump tiers at configuration time:
All four run Ubuntu Linux LTS Server out of the box, come with ECC-capable DDR5 RAM up to 512 GB, and ship with assembly, burn-in, and a 3-year warranty.
Our internal component costs tracked above — and therefore the baseline configuration prices you see on each product page — are mid-April 2026. The two forces moving them right now are (1) the AI-driven DDR5 memory supply crunch, which has roughly doubled ECC server RAM pricing since Q3 2025, and (2) the NAND flash shortage pushing SSD prices up. We’ll keep this post synced with our configurator. If you see a number here that doesn’t match what the configurator shows, trust the configurator — it’s the system of record.
This post is the overview. Over the next few weeks we’ll be publishing deeper dives on:
Got a specific model you want to run and aren’t sure which tier fits? Drop us a line and we’ll build the configuration for you.
joe April 15th, 2026
Posted In: AI, Deep Learning, LLM, Local AI, New products, Open Source, Rackmount Servers, servers, Technology
Tags: AI, AMD Radeon, Blackwell, Deep Learning, eRacks, GPU, Inference, Intel Arc, Llama, LLM, Local AI, Machine Learning, Open Source, Rackmount Servers, RDNA 4, VRAM

The data storage market in 2026 is doing something unusual: it’s both growing fast and getting cheaper per terabyte at the same time. Global storage requirements are projected to nearly double by 2029, hitting roughly 20,000 exabytes. The NAS hardware market alone is forecast to grow from $55B today to $173B+ by 2034 – a 15.5% CAGR. And while all that’s happening, 30TB+ enterprise SATA drives have become genuinely mainstream, with retail prices that put petabyte-scale on-premise storage within reach of mid-sized organizations for the first time.
Meanwhile, the cloud-storage decade is hitting a wall. Egress fees on AWS, Azure and GCP have only gone up. Ransomware losses keep climbing. Healthcare, legal, finance, and government buyers are all asking the same question they used to leave for the IT department: where, exactly, is our data? The answer “somewhere in us-east-1” doesn’t satisfy a HIPAA auditor, a SOC 2 attestation, or a court order anymore.
For years, the argument against running storage in your own rack was capex vs opex – “cloud is cheaper because you don’t buy hardware.” That math has flipped for any organization storing more than a few hundred TB. A 36-bay NAS loaded with 24TB drives gives you nearly a petabyte of raw storage for the price of about 8-10 months of equivalent S3 storage at production-tier rates – and the hardware keeps working for 5-7 years after that.
Three things made it flip:
Our rackmount NAS line covers everything from a small workgroup file server to true petabyte-scale storage chassis. All ship with real Ubuntu Linux (your choice of file system – ZFS, XFS, or Btrfs), enterprise components (ECC RAM, redundant power supplies, hot-swap bays), and zero proprietary management software. The OS is yours, the data is yours, the hardware is yours.
| Model | Form | Bays | Max Raw | Starting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAS4 | 1U | 4 | 144TB | $1,895 |
| NAS6 | 2U | 6 | 180TB | $2,795 |
| NAS8 | 2U | 8 | 240TB+ | $3,695 |
| NAS12 | 2U | 12 | 360TB | $4,695 |
| NAS16 | 3U | 16+2 | 288TB | $6,595 |
| NAS24 | 4U | 24 | 720TB | $8,995 |
| NAS36 | 4U | 36 | ~1PB | $10,495 |
| NAS50 | 9U | 50 | 1.3PB | $13,595 |
| NAS60 | 4U | 60 | ~2PB | $15,995 |
| NAS72 | 4U | 72 | 1.5PB+ | $19,995 |
| NAS100 | 4U | 102 | 2.6PB | $24,995 |
Starting prices are barebones (chassis, motherboard, PSU); add drives, RAM, OS choice at configuration. Custom builds welcome.
Because we don’t ship a proprietary OS, you get to pick the storage stack that matches your workload. Common combinations our customers deploy:
Pre-installed and tested before shipping, or shipped bare for you to provision however you like – your call at order time.
Six segments dominate our NAS pipeline this year:
We don’t build consumer NAS appliances. There’s no fancy iOS app to manage your photos. We don’t license a proprietary OS or lock you into a vendor ecosystem. If you want a four-bay desktop box with a slick web UI for your home media collection, we’re not your shop – and that’s fine, lots of good vendors serve that market.
What we do build: enterprise rackmount storage on standard Linux, configurable to your exact spec, that you fully own and can replace any component on. The same approach we’ve taken since 1999.
Drive count, RAID level, networking (10/25/100GbE), RAM (1GB per TB is the rule of thumb for ZFS), and OS choice all matter. Reply to this post or hit our contact page with rough requirements and we’ll spec it for you – usually same day.
joe April 8th, 2026
Posted In: Backups, Linux, Open Source, Rackmount Servers, servers, Storage
Tags: backup, ceph, Cloud Storage Server, eRacks, eRacks signature service, eRacks/NAS24, eRacks/NAS36, eRacks/NAS50, MooseFS, NAS, NAS24, NAS36, NAS50, NAS72, Privacy, Rackmount, sata